EDGE Hack 2026
Judges Appointment Criteria Judges for EDGE Hack 2026 are appointed through a structured and selective evaluation process conducted by the organizing committee in collaboration with academic and industry advisors. The objective is to ensure that all appointed judges demonstrate exceptional expertise, established professional credibility, and the ability to independently evaluate innovative and technical submissions across domains.
Candidates considered for the judging panel must meet one or more of the following:
1
Expertise in Core Technical Domains Applicants must demonstrate strong domain knowledge and practical experience in at least one of the following areas:
Enterprise Data Architecture
Generative AI and Advanced AI Systems
2
Professional or Academic Standing Applicants should hold senior or distinguished roles in industry or academia, such as:
Principal Engineer, Architect, or Technical Lead
Director, Vice President, CTO, or equivalent leadership roles
Researcher, Professor, or Faculty at an accredited institution
3
Demonstrated Impact and Recognition Candidates should have a proven record of impact, which may include:
Leadership in high-impact technology initiatives
Peer-reviewed publications, patents, or recognized contributions
Experience in judging, reviewing, or evaluating the work of others in technical, academic, or professional settings
4
Independence and Ethical Standards To ensure fairness and integrity:
No direct affiliation with participating teams
Full disclosure of any conflicts of interest
Commitment to objective, unbiased, and professional evaluation standards
All nominations are reviewed by the event Advisory Board in collaboration with the EDGE Hackathon Organizing Committee.
Selections are based on:
The selection process is overseen by the event advisory board members.