Resources

Judging Criteria

EDGE Hack 2026 — How submissions are evaluated

All projects are evaluated by a panel of expert judges using a standardized scoring rubric. Judges are selected by the faculty of the Computer Science Department, San Jose State University, based on extraordinary ability and professional standing.
1

Innovation & Originality (25%)

How novel and creative is the solution? Does it address a problem in a new or unexpected way? Judges will assess the uniqueness of the idea and its potential to disrupt or improve existing approaches.

2

Technical Execution (25%)

How well is the solution technically implemented? Judges evaluate the quality of code, architecture design, use of data technologies, and the robustness of the working prototype.

3

Impact & Relevance (20%)

How significant is the potential impact? Does the solution address a real-world problem in data architecture or generative AI? Judges consider scalability and real-world applicability.

4

Presentation & Communication (15%)

How effectively does the team communicate their idea? Judges assess clarity, confidence, and the ability to articulate the problem, solution, and business value within the allotted time.

5

Use of Data Architecture & AI (15%)

How effectively does the solution leverage data architecture principles and/or generative AI technologies? Judges look for thoughtful integration of the hackathon's core themes.

Organized by New iDea Solutions © 2026 Edge Hackathon. All rights reserved.